Brutality Freakz
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Forget Returns!

Go down

Forget Returns! Empty Forget Returns!

Post by ladykiller on Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:41 pm

One of the most unimportant statistics of any manager or trading system is its returns. Returns alone tell investors nothing about the risk needed to reach those returns. As an example, how will we know if a 100% return is good? The answer should be it is dependent on the risk needed to get it. Who cares if 1 or 2 people made 100 percent return if an even greater share of the investors lost all their money first!

What does matter is RISK adjusted RETURNS. After we know how large of a risk a system or manager took to reach a return it is then we can correctly appraise the returns.

So how can we measure risk adjusted performance? One of my favorite ways is using the MAR Ratio. This is short for the Managed Account Reports Ratio. What MAR measures is the average annual percentage return divided by the largest percentage drawdown. It’s a necessity investors use percentages and not raw profit or loss dollar amounts in order for the ratio to be correct.

If, for example, a manager or trading method had an average annual return of 30% and at one time had a maximum drawdown of 15% then his MAR Ratio would be two. In others words, 30 divided by 15 = 2.

What’s a superb MAR Ratio? To determine this, I suspect one of the finest places to look is at the sector of professionally managed money. These managers are sometimes the very best of the best when it comes to traders. In a few cases, they have track records 20 and 30 years old and have hundreds of millions or many billions of dollars under management. When we look at the best of those managers, they are fortunate if they may be able to maintain a MAR Ratio of one! Meaning, if they have made a median of 30% a year, then they also likely had an onetime largest drawdown of 30%.

I hope this sets off 1 or 2 alarms in your head. Traders should wonder how it is they see products offering off the chart performance, when the best of the best cannot do it! They may have had a lucky period, but 99.9 % of the time they took more risk than a trader would doubtless ever want to take.

This draft is about realism, and what I believe is really possible with top caliber trading systems and money managers. Remember, I have developed trading systems for more than eighteen years and have won many awards for them. Besides this, I have gone on to be a successful hedge fund manager attracting tens of millions of dollars in investing funds.

So what do I think is possible? The answer’s a MAR Ratio of 1.5 – 2.00. In other words, an average yearly percentage return about 1.5 to 2 times higher than the maximum percentage drawdown.

One of the best risk adjusted returns I have is my Relativity Trading System. I have geared the leverage to the point that historically it shows about a 35% yearly return and about a 17% maximum drawdown. So the ratio is almost 2 to 1. Keep in mind, the leverage can easily be doubled with the same account size and now it will shows returns of about 70%; nonetheless the drawdown will go up to about 34%. In other words, it’ll maintain that approximately 2 to 1 ratio.


biggest loser dvds
travesti

ladykiller

Number of posts : 28
Age : 33
Registration date : 2011-02-10

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum